Saltar para: Posts [1], Pesquisa [2]

Geopolítica e Política

Lusa - Lusística - Mundial

Geopolítica e Política

Lusa - Lusística - Mundial

The Shameful Way That The American Empire Is Ending

By Eric Zuesse at Oriental Review on Mach 25, 2024

25.03.24 | Duarte Pacheco Pereira

Imperial America

The Collapse of the American Empire. What Future for Humankind?

 

———————

The American empire — which is now the largest empire in history — is ending not only with defeats on every front, but with the historically profound stigma of being one of the two perpetrators (the other and more-publicized one being Israel) of the largest ethnic-cleansing operation (to remove all of the 2.3 million Gazans from Gaza) ever since Hitler’s ethnic-cleansing campaign ended.

That one ended after the Soviet Union defeated the Third Reich (or 3rd German empire) at the battle of Kursk on 23 August 1943 and so made inevitable the defeat of Hitler, and the end of his Third Reich, and the end of their organized extermination program against Jews, Gypsies, and other ‘non-Aryans’ — as well as made inevitable, from that date forward, the ultimate defeat of the Japanese empire, which (from that date forward) was only a matter of when, and no longer of whether, Japan would surrender.

The atomic bombings in August 1945 didn’t determine that victory over Japan; Hitler’s defeat at Kursk in August 1943 did. But, of course, the U.S. regime and its colonies allege that the U.S. and UK defeated Germany, though only Soviet troops entered Berlin and drove Hitler to commit suicide on 30 April 1945, thus conquering Germany. Because FDR had died just 18 days prior to that, and his successor Truman was an unknown and Stalin wanted his relations with Truman to be like his relations with FDR had been — mutually beneficial — Stalin generously allowed U.S., UK, and French, forces in as-if they all had done it, defeated Germany, so as to continue the anti-nazi alliance into the post-WW2 era. That turned out to have been a catastrophic error on Stalin’s part, simply a gamble that turned out to have been wrong.

The U.S. regime now does mainly proxy wars, because its only military victory (with its own troops) in the 130+ military invasions it has carried out ever since WW2, was the small one, 46 years later, and 33 years ago, in America’s 1991 battle for Kuwait; and America’s biggest-ever proxy war is the one that’s been going on ever since 2014 to defeat Russia in the battlefields of Ukraine using mainly Ukrainian troops who are being supplied by the U.S. and its colonies, with weapons, intelligence, and training. And this proxy war, like all of America’s other ones, is now almost certainly going down to defeat, after the expenditures of over 600,000 dead already, and perhaps over a trillion dollars of taxpayer expenses ultimately, all in order for the U.S. Government to keep Ukraine, which it grabbed control over in a bloody and barbaric February 2014 coup that it and its allies called a ‘democratic revolution’ though it actually terminated Ukraine’s democracy and turned that nation into the U.S. regime’s springboard into the U.S. empire’s planned ultimate conquest of Russia.

1

biden-netanyahu-gaza.webp

The Shameful Way That The American Empire Is Ending

 

The war in Ukraine culminates the U.S. regime’s plan ever since Russia ended the Cold War on its side in 1991 while America secretly continued its side of that war by expanding NATO right up to Russia’s borders, and especially into Ukraine itself because Ukraine is closer to The Kremlin than any other country is, barely 300 miles away, ideal for a blitz five-minute U.S. missile decapitation of Russia’s central command.

The U.S. regime started privately telling its stooges, first West Germany’s Helmut Kohl on 24 February 1990, but then later Francois Mitterrand and others, that though the Soviet Union and its communism and its Warsaw Pact mirror to America’s anti-Russian NATO military alliance — and the entire Russian side of the Cold War — all would soon end, the Cold War would secretly continue on the U.S.-and-allied side, until Russia itself will be conquered. Consequently, starting on 24 February 1990, America’s stooge regimes began to understand that though the prior excuse for the Cold War on America’s side was ‘anti-communism’, the reality was and is that on the American side, that war’s objective is — by whatever means (subversion, coup, proxy war, sanctions, or otherwise) — to win control over the entire world, and that Russia is America’s main target to grab control over, so as to culminate its empire.

Under Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s Presidency until his death on 12 April 1945 just before WW2 ended, there was no Cold War, despite some U.S. officials, such as J. Edgar Hoover, who wanted it. President Roosevelt had no qualms about accepting the Soviet leader Joseph Stalin as an ally so long as both countries would be committed to defeating Hitler: for FDR, no country has any right to interfere in any other country’s domestic affairs; and, so, the Soviet Union’s domestic affairs were irrelevant to U.S.-Soviet relations. U.S. Senator Harry Truman disagreed with FDR about that; and In 1944, the Democratic Party’s megadonors required President Roosevelt to accept Truman as his running-mate for Vice President. That decision by the Democratic Party’s megadonors produced the Cold War when President Truman, upon the advice from both his personal hero General Dwight Eisenhower and Britain’s Prime Minister Winston Churchill, decided on 25 July 1945 that America must conquer — no longer cooperate with — the Soviet Union. Within just two years, FDR’s entire Cabinet was replaced. Truman was the ultimate anti-FDR.

Today’s America is the one that Truman and his hero Eisenhower created, not the one that FDR had carefully started to plan in August 1941 until he died on 12 April 1945. Truman reversed FDR’s foreign policies. In order to understand how this happened, the reality of WW2 has to be truthfully understood.

The most masterful summary of how WW2 ended is the 12 May 2015 article by Ronnie Kasrils, his “Op-Ed: Lest we forget the truth about World War Two”, which is 100% truthful and covers all of the historically important points, so that the reader can understand how much the U.S. regime and its post-WW2 colonies (or ‘allies’) lie about that history in order to ‘justify’ their decision (which was made on 25 July 1945) by U.S. President Truman to now go forward by creating and expanding ultimately throughout the world an American empire, the first target of which would be to conquer Russia — the very same country that had actually won WW2 for the Allies. Agents for the U.S. regime lie profusely about history in order to deceive the public that the U.S. and/or Britain was/were mainly responsible for the defeat of Hitler and the Allied victory in WW 2. We’re inundated with that propaganda.

So: the American empire, which began with a plethora of lies, is now ending with a campaign against the Gazans that might ultimately become remembered as being the second-worst genocide in history — #1 being, of course, the Holocaust by Hitler and his German Third Empire (which was carried out not by bombings and a siege like the Israel-U.S. one now is, but instead by search-and-destroy operations against its ‘racial’ targets, plus industrialized mass-murdering “concentration camps”). Though the means of carrying out the genocide aren’t identical, both of those campaigns rightfully earn the world’s contempt and disgust.

Yet the U.S. Government is a full partner with Israel’s Government in carrying out this ethnic cleansing or possibly even full genocide of the Gazans. Biden fully supports Israel’s ethnic cleansing or even genocide against the Gazans, though he speaks against it in order to fool enough voters so as to win a second term. Furthermore, the Washington Post reported on 18 March 2024 that ever since 27 October 2023, Biden has known that Israel’s saying they intending to kill only Hamas is a lie and that they’re bombing and sieging Gaza so as to exterminate or otherwise get rid of all of its residents. So, if Netanyahu gets convicted and hung for this genocide, then Biden ought to get hang too, because he is the person who authorizes all of the weaons, ammunition and guidance, in order for Israel to do it.

And there also are other ways in which the U.S. regime is shamefully behaving while its previously ever-expanding empire is starting to fall apart.

The only country that regularly and always votes in the U.N. General Assembly against Resolutions that condemn racism and bigotry in all of its forms including nazism and Holocaust-denial, is the United States, largely because ever since 1945 the U.S. has brought into this country so many elite Nazis and gave them sanctuary and hid their atrocities from the public. But in recent years, one of the main excuses it gives is that Ukraine is voting against it and so America must do likewise in order to reaffirm its support for Ukraine. (In fact, America’s U.N. Representative that year said the reason for America’s refusing to vote against nazism was America’s opposition to Russia and support for Ukraine. India’s Representative said that the fact that Russia had introduced the Resolution was irrelevant to whether it should be adopted.) The only other country that has often been joining with America’s and Ukraine’s pro-nazi votes at the U.N. has been Canada, which (like America) had brought in and provided sanctuary for many Ukrainian Nazis after WW II. In fact, as I headlined on 24 September 2023, “Canada’s Parliament Gives Standing Ovation to 98-Year-Old Nazi SS Ukrainian”. But, actually, America’s anti-Russian military alliance NATO is simply riddled with nazis. Lies cover this up. And America’s lie-based invasions of Iraq in 2003 and of Libya in 2011 and of Syria ever since 2013, are all nazistic and lie-based, too; so, the evidence that the post-WW-II U.S. Government is nazi is clear and undeniable. All of this comes from Truman, under the advice from both Eisenhower and Churchill.

Anyone who would call this a democracy would have to be either blind or crazy. The only way that the U.S. regime can keep it going is on the basis of lies. And now the empire that is based upon those lies is starting to fall apart. The key event will be when the first NATO member Government will either block a NATO action or else quit the NATO alliance. Or else, if neither of those happens, then the key event will be what will happen because neither of them did happen: WW3. Either the empire will collapse, or else the entire world will self-destruct as a result of the U.S. Government’s actions.

———————

 

 

William Blake: The Great Red Dragon and the Woman Clothed with the Sun (detail)

William Blake: The Great Red Dragon and the Woman Clothed with the Sun (detail)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

END

 

Talmudismo

Talmudismo ou Rabinismo

21.03.24 | Duarte Pacheco Pereira

Aftermath of the Temple's Destruction

Why Josephus Matters
é possível legendar (automáticamente) o vídeo em português

 

o Talmudismo não é o Judaísmo

alternativamente

o Cristianismo é tão o Judaísmo quanto o Talmudismo

 

 

O Judaísmo dos Asmoneus morreu no ano 70 com a destruição do Templo de Herodes pelo general romano Tito, filho, depois sucessor, do Imperador Vespasiano.

 

O Judaísmo dos Asmoneus deu origem a duas novas religiões:

1. O Cristianismo, a religião dos que reconheceram Jesus como o Messias prometido aos Filhos de Israel.

2. O Talmudismo, ou Rabinismo, a religião dos que não reconheceram Jesus como o Messias prometido aos Filhos de Israel.

 

O Cristianismo cresceu e prosperou no seio do Império Romano.

Império Romano em 117 d.C.

Império Romano em 117 d.C.

 

O Talmudiusmo cresceu e prosperou no seio do Império Sassânida.

Império Sassânida em em 620 d.C.

Império Sassânida em em 620 d.C.

 

O Cristianismo é monista.

O Talmudiusmo é não é monista.

 

 

 

American Pravda: Oddities of the Jewish Religion

 

American Pravda:
Oddities of the Jewish Religion

The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism

Ron Unz • The Unz Review • July, 2018 • 7.800 Palavras • Has Many Comments
É possível traduzir (automáticamente) o artigo para português


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Israel Shahak and the Middle East

About a decade ago, I happened to be talking with an eminent academic scholar who had become known for his sharp criticism of Israeli policies in the Middle East and America’s strong support for them. I mentioned that I myself had come to very similar conclusions some time before, and he asked when that had happened. I told him it had been in 1982, and I think he found my answer quite surprising. I got the sense that date was decades earlier than would have been given by almost anyone else he knew.

Sometimes it is quite difficult to pinpoint when one’s world view on a contentious topic undergoes sharp transformation, but at other times it is quite easy. My own perceptions of the Middle East conflict drastically shifted during Fall 1982, and they have subsequently changed only to a far smaller extent. As some might remember, that period marked the first Israeli invasion of Lebanon, and culminated in the notorious Sabra-Shatila Massacre during which hundreds or even thousands of Palestinians were slaughtered in their refugee camps. But although those events were certainly major factors in my ideological realignment, the crucial trigger was actually a certain letter to the editor published around that same time.

…  …  …

The Unusual Doctrines of Traditional Judaism

…  …  …

Although Shahak’s books are quite short, they contain such a density of astonishing material, it would take many, many thousands of words to begin to summarize them. Almost everything I had known—or thought I had known—about the religion of Judaism, at least in its zealously Orthodox traditional form, was utterly wrong.

For example, traditionally religious Jews pay little attention to most of the Old Testament, and even very learned rabbis or students who have devoted many years to intensive study may remain largely ignorant of its contents. Instead, the center of their religious world view is the Talmud, an enormously large, complex, and somewhat contradictory mass of secondary writings and commentary built up over many centuries, which is why their religious doctrine is sometimes called “Talmudic Judaism.” Among large portions of the faithful, the Talmud is supplemented by the Kabala, another large collection of accumulated writings, mostly focused on mysticism and all sorts of magic. Since these commentaries and interpretations represent the core of the religion, much of what everyone takes for granted in the Bible is considered in a very different manner.

Given the nature of the Talmudic basis of traditional Judaism and my total previous ignorance of the subject, any attempt on my part of summarize some of the more surprising aspects of Shahak’s description may be partially garbled, and is certainly worthy of correction by someone better versed in that dogma. And since so many parts of the Talmud are highly contradictory and infused with complex mysticism, it would be impossible for someone like me to attempt to disentangle the seeming inconsistencies that I am merely repeating. I should note that although Shahak’s description of the beliefs and practices of Talmudic Judaism provoked a fire-storm of denunciations, few of those harsh critics seem to have denied his very specific claims, including the most astonishing ones, which would seem to strengthen his credibility.

On the most basic level, the religion of most traditional Jews is actually not at all monotheistic, but instead contains a wide variety of different male and female gods, having quite complex relations to each other, with these entities and their properties varying enormously among the numerous different Jewish sub-sects, depending upon which portions of the Talmud and the Kabala they place uppermost. For example, the traditional Jewish religious cry “The Lord Is One” has always been interpreted by most people to be an monotheistic affirmation, and indeed, many Jews take exactly this same view. But large numbers of other Jews believe this declaration instead refers to achievement of sexual union between the primary male and female divine entities. And most bizarrely, Jews having such radically different views see absolutely no difficulty in praying side by side, and merely interpreting their identical chants in very different fashion.

Furthermore, religious Jews apparently pray to Satan almost as readily as they pray to God, and depending upon the various rabbinical schools, the particular rituals and sacrifices they practice may be aimed at enlisting the support of the one or the other. Once again, so long as the rituals are properly followed, the Satan-worshippers and the God-worshippers get along perfectly well and consider each other equally pious Jews, merely of a slightly different tradition. One point that Shahak repeatedly emphasizes is that in traditional Judaism the nature of the ritual itself is absolutely uppermost, while the interpretation of the ritual is rather secondary. So perhaps a Jew who washes his hands three times clockwise might be horrified by another who follows a counter-clockwise direction, but whether the hand-washing were meant to honor God or to honor Satan would hardly be a matter of much consequence.

Strangely enough, many of the traditional rituals are explicitly intended to fool or trick God or His angels or sometimes Satan, much like the mortal heroes of some Greek legend might seek to trick Zeus or Aphrodite. For example, certain prayers must be uttered in Aramaic rather than Hebrew on the grounds that holy angels apparently don’t understand the former language, and their confusion allows those verses to slip by unimpeded and take effect without divine interference.

…  …  …

 

PARA TRADUZIR O ARTIGO PARA PORTUGUÊS

Para traduzir para português

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FIM

 

À atenção dos passadistas

17.03.24 | Álvaro Aragão Athayde

‎Ampulheta com o o tempo a andar para trás

Ó Tempo! … Volta p'ra trás! …

 

Para os passadistas de plantão, o melhor já foi e a única possibilidade de hoje é viver para ontem.
Folha
 de S.Paulo, 12/02/2013 

 

 

Não, o Chega não vai desaparecer como o PRD. Eis porquê

Eu ria-me de cada vez que André Ventura dizia que um dia iria ser primeiro-ministro. Já parei de rir.

João Miguel Tavares • Público • 16 de Março de 2024, às 00:00

Tenho insistido muito neste ponto desde o dia 10 de Março, e vou desenvolvê-lo hoje aqui mais detalhadamente, porque algo de muito profundo aconteceu na política portuguesa em 2024, e há quem continue a não querer ver. Não basta dizer “18% por cento”, nem sequer “1,1 milhões de votos”, para perceber a força do Chega. É preciso olhar para a distribuição nacional dos votos, comparar o Chega com o PSD e com o PS, e começar a perceber que aquilo que até há pouco tempo era impensável pode mesmo vir a concretizar-se num futuro não muito longínquo. Eu ria-me de cada vez que André Ventura dizia que um dia iria ser primeiro-ministro. Já parei de rir.

A razão essencial para isso é que a distribuição de votos do Chega demonstra que o partido de André Ventura está a funcionar como uma tenaz. Boa parte da esquerda ainda está convencida de que os votos que ele está a captar são oriundos exclusivamente da direita ou da abstenção. Não é verdade. O Chega está a captar votos de conservadores, de saudosistas do antigo regime, de ribatejanos das touradas, de jovens fartos dos partidos tradicionais, de abstencionistas desiludidos – mas também dos eleitores do sul pobre, do interior abandonado e das grandes periferias urbanas. Ou seja, o Chega está a receber votos de todas as áreas ideológicas, de todas as classes e em todo o país. Sim, em 1985, o PRD também obteve perto de 18% dos votos. Mas o PRD nunca teve esta distribuição nacional.

Em 1985, o PRD não elegeu deputados em Bragança, Vila Real, Guarda, Portalegre, Beja, Madeira e nos círculos da Europa e de Fora da Europa. Para já, o Chega apenas não elegeu em Bragança – e mesmo aí obteve 18,2% dos votos, acima da média nacional. Vivendo nós num país que é ao mesmo tempo coeso e dual, dividido entre o Norte e o Sul e o Mediterrâneo e o Atlântico, o mais difícil para um partido político é instalar-se de forma homogénea em todo o território. O PRD nunca o conseguiu. Mais do que isso: o PSD nunca o conseguiu. E agora, o choque: o Chega está a consegui-lo.

Deixem-me repetir isto, porque é o ponto absolutamente fundamental destas eleições, e não me parece que esteja a ter a devida atenção: é a primeira vez que um partido de direita consegue aproximar-se da casa dos 20% com uma diferença tão curta entre o distrito onde foi mais votado e o distrito onde foi menos votado. O PRD em 1985 obteve 24,4% em Castelo Branco, mas 6,9% em Bragança. O Chega em 2024 obteve um máximo de 27,2% em Faro e um mínimo de 15,3% no Porto. Isso significa, no caso do Chega, que a diferença entre extremos fica abaixo dos 12 pontos percentuais. Estes são valores com os quais apenas o PS consegue competir em termos de homogeneidade do voto a nível nacional.

Fosse nos bons ou nos maus momentos, o PSD nunca realmente conseguiu quebrar a barreira Norte/Sul. O Chega está a consegui-lo. Não, 2024 não tem nada a ver com 1985 – e 1987 nunca irá voltar

Mesmo nos tempos gloriosos das maiorias absolutas de Cavaco Silva, o PSD ficava acima dos 60% no Norte, mas na casa dos 30% no Sul. Nas legislativas de 2022, em que o PS só perdeu na Madeira, o PSD obteve 40,3% em Bragança, mas 15,9% em Beja. Fosse nos bons ou nos maus momentos, o PSD nunca realmente conseguiu quebrar a barreira Norte/Sul. O Chega está a consegui-lo. O partido de Ventura teve três vezes mais votos do que o PCP no Seixal e em Setúbal, que são câmaras comunistas. Em Grândola, a mítica vila morena, outra câmara comunista que ainda resiste, o PCP teve 12,5% dos votos e o Chega 19,5%. Em todos esses concelhos ficou à frente do PSD. Não, 2024 não tem nada que ver com 1985 – e 1987 nunca irá voltar.

O autor é colunista do PÚBLICO

Original e comentários aqui.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FIM

 

Is The West Headed For A Planned Cataclysm?

Mark Wauck • Meaning In History • March 15, 2024

15.03.24 | Duarte Pacheco Pereira

Europe 1916 : Boardman Robinson.

Europe 1916 / Boardman Robinson
Cartoon shows Death riding an emaciated donkey and leading it toward a precipice by dangling a carrot, "victory," from a stick.

 

It’s clear enough that the collective West is headed for a real bruising. Over the past few days I’ve seen a number of articles that suggest that the Globalist ruling class has been planning a cataclysm with the aim of asserting total control on a global scale. This isn’t necessarily a new idea. There are quite a few people who argue that this is exactly what Covid was intended to trigger. It’s a vast topic, so I’ll confine my remarks here to these most recent article.

The first article appeared as a guest essay at Larry Johnson’s blog. The idea behind the article is precisely in line with what we just suggested—that the otherwise inexplicable economic related actions of the ruling class in Europe are intended to precipitate a severe crisis and crush the subject population—while claiming that only a centralization of societal control can save Europe. We can certainly see signs of this in France and Poland, where the attempt to foment a crisis seems to be part of the plan.

But there appears to be increasing pushback across Europe—not least in France and Poland. In Germany there’s a strong rise of the “right” party AfD. The Italian government has stated that France and Poland don’t speak for Europe. Politics in the UK are in a muddle, but a counter cultural measure took me by surprise—the use of puberty blockers on children has been halted. Since the transgressionist model of trans-humanism—including what amounts to an abolition of women—is a key part of the Globalist push, that must be seen as significant. The same goes for the overwhelming rejection by Irish voters of a measure that would have redefined not only marriage but women. In Portugal, too, after years of supine acceptance, voters have reacted strongly against the directives coming from the EU.


In that context, here’s an excerpt from the intro to the essay I referenced above:

European Union Economy.jpg

WHY IS THE EUROPEAN UNION DESTROYING ITS OWN ECONOMY?

It has puzzled many how the EU has been managing its economy since the beginning of the Ukraine war. There have been two distinct shocks inflicted upon the Eurozone economy since then. The third shock, which may be the worst, is on the way. All of them are direct results of European policies.

The first shock was the increase in energy prices (and availability) resulting from the sanctions on Russia. ...

The second shock is the obvious and all-out regulatory and bureaucratic attack from Brussels on European companies and entire sectors of the Eurozone economies. ...

It is baffling to any rational person why the EU has chosen to add to the effect of the sanctions by engineering a further destruction of European economies. Before addressing this apparent lunacy, let’s look into the future and check out shock number three which will most likely hit Europe (and the entire West) sometime in the next few years.

The third shock will be the “externally forced” devaluation of the euro and a massive drop in European living standards. …

I have my doubts about the third shock, whether that’s what is intended. However, the author’s argument is that the goal of the Globalist EU cabal is to force the rest of the world to do business with Europe on Europe’s climatist terms. Pay attention to the word “powerful”:

the EU believes that it is so powerful that it can dictate these standards to the world, and that they will, as a consequence, be adopted globally – and eventually in full. This also means that the EU is preparing to “isolate” those who don’t comply – forcing them to comply like it is forcing European companies to comply. The existence of the BRICS doesn’t enter into the equation, or the possibility of European isolation.

That paragraph gives the delusional nature of the game away. But this is the goal, and it has its adherents here in the US, as well. It has to do with the exercise of power.

…   …   …   …   …   …   

     Read the full article and readers' comments here.

 

 

 

end

 

 

The Strange Death of Europe

 

Jacob Frank, Sabbatai Zevi's Second Coming

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

END