Saltar para: Posts [1], Pesquisa [2]

Geopolítica e Política

Lusa - Lusística - Mundial

Geopolítica e Política

Lusa - Lusística - Mundial

Racialismo

Brasil copia o pior do Racialismo Americano

22.07.23 | Duarte Pacheco Pereira

Races: Irish Iberian, Anglo-Teutonic, Negro

Uma ilustração da obra de H. Strickland Constable Ireland from One or Two Neglected Points of View mostra uma suposta semelhança entre características “Irlandesas Ibéricas” e “Negras” em contraste com as superiores características “Anglo-Teutónicas”.
A legenda que acompanha a figura diz: «Acredita-se que os Ibéricos tenham sido originalmente uma Raça Africana, que há milhares de anos se espalhou, através da Espanha, pela Europa Ocidental. Os seus restos mortais são encontrados em túmulos, ou locais de sepultamento, em diversos locais desses países. Os seus crânios são do tipo prognato baixo. Eles vieram para a Irlanda e misturaram-se com os nativos do Sul e do Oeste, eles próprios supostamente de tipo inferior e descendentes de selvagens da Idade da Pedra, que, em consequência do seu isolamento do resto do mundo, nunca tinham sido derrotados na saudável luta da vida e, assim, abriram caminho, de acordo com as leis da natureza, para raças superiores.»

 

Racialismo é a convicção de que a espécie humana se divide naturalmente em raças, raças essas que correspondem a categorias biológicas ostensivamente distintas. 
O Racialismo, foi no passado designado por Racismo Biológico, ou por Racismo Científico, designações actualmente abandonadas por se ter concluido que não existem, biológica e cientificamente falando, Raças Humanas, ou, dito de outro modo, por se ter concluido que o conceito de Raça Humana é cultural, não é biológico.

 

 

Brasil copia o pior do Racialismo Americano


Alexandre Garcia • Jornal da Besta Fubana • 25 de abril de 2023

Batalha dos Guararapes de Victor Meirelles

“A batalha dos Guararapes”, de Victor Meirelles: Em 1648, portugueses, africanos e índios se uniram para expulsar os holandeses do Brasil

Antes de viajar, o presidente Lula sancionou uma lei aprovada pelos nossos representantes e publicada no Diário Oficial de segunda-feira, dia 24; portanto, já está em vigor. Ela altera o chamando Estatuto da Igualdade Racial, mas é exatamente o contrário, ela nos divide. Isso porque faz o IBGE gravar qual é a nossa raça e qual é a nossa etnia, e as empresas têm de colocar na ficha do empregado qual é a raça dele, por exemplo.

Eu não sei como é que vão descobrir isso, porque os exames que têm sido feitos aleatoriamente no Brasil, com sangue de brasileiros, mostram que nós somos uma mistura insuspeitada. Há quem ache ser sueco, mas é asiático, é africano… Nós somos uma grande mistura, uma bendita mistura que deu certo, que pegou o melhor de todas as genéticas sanguíneas da África, da Ásia, da Europa, do Oriente Médio, do continente brasileiro, da América do Sul… mas agora vamos ter de escrever de que raça nós somos. Isso é racismo, é cópia dos americanos, é papagaiada, é macaquice que adoramos copiar do neomarxismo americano.

E para que isso? Para dividir, muito simples. Divide et impera – “divide e subjuga”, porque a divisão enfraquece uma nação unida, acaba com a união de todos, como a união que tivemos para expulsar os holandeses. Índios, africanos e portugueses se uniram em brasileiros para expulsar os holandeses, formaram o exército brasileiro em 1648, e assim tem sido. Eu passei toda a minha mocidade sem notar que tínhamos cores diferentes, mas agora não, estão impondo isso. E, com toda essa ênfase nas aparências, esquecem o verdadeiro valor, que é o caráter da pessoa, o seu conhecimento, a sua capacidade de agir, os seus méritos em tudo, e não a aparência. A aparência é só a casquinha, o mínimo. É incrível, mas foi a lei que nossos representantes fizeram.

• • •

Lula termina uma passagem muito esquisita por Portugal

O presidente da República está saindo de Portugal para a Espanha. A passagem dele por aqui foi muito estranha, nas entrevistas que deu atrapalhou-se na língua, fingia até que não entendia português quando não queria responder, e tiveram de criar uma série de agendas, como troca de condecorações e prêmios, para justificar essa permanência dele aqui em Lisboa.

As duas nações têm de viver muito próximas. Portugal é a porta aberta da Europa para o Brasil e está sendo uma grande porta aberta para brasileiros que vêm trabalhar por aqui, mas também houve a reação do partido Chega, que não quis saber de alguém com a biografia de Lula em Portugal e se manifestou com toda a força contra a presença do presidente do Brasil.

Também por aqui repercutem as imagens do Palácio do Planalto que foram pouco a pouco reveladas no Brasil, e que deixaram todo mundo intrigado para saber o que foi que realmente aconteceu, aumentando a necessidade de deputados e senadores investigarem. Foi algo grande demais para se deixar nas mãos de uma delegacia de polícia ou da Procuradoria-Geral da República.

1

Roque Cunha em 25 de abril de 2023 às 08:36 disse:
Tô lascado Alexandre. Da parte materna, minha bisavó tinha sobrenome Brumhawer e meu bisavô era um índio Aymará. Meu avô era descendentes de potiguaras que lutaram na Guararapes. Meu bisavô paterno ficou livre quando tinha 17 anos e minha bisavó era emigrante dos Açores com olhos azuis. Afinal de contas que catzo eu serei com essa nova papagaiada lulo-petralha?

 

Original aqui.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FIM

 

 

 

Sobrevivência

Sobrevive o mais forte ou o que mais rapidamente se adapta à mudança?

21.07.23 | Duarte Pacheco Pereira

Acasalamento de mamutes

Como era a anatomia de um mamute?

 

Os mamutes sobreviveram?

Não.

Os humanos sobreviveram?

Sim.

Porquê?

Porque, ao contrário do que muitos pensam, não sobrevivem os mais fortes, sobrevivem os que mais rapidamente se adaptam à mudança.

Os humanos sobreviveram porque se adaptaram com suficiente rapidez ao fim da última Era do Gelo.

Os mamutes não sobreviveram porque não se adaptaram com suficiente rapidez ao fim da última Era do Gelo.

Note-se, e é importante, que os mamutes só se podiam adaptar à mudança carnalmente (geneticamente), um processo que demora milhares, centenas de milhares, ou milhões, de anos, enquanto que os humanos se podiam, e podem, adaptar à mudança tanto carnalmente (geneticamente, tal qual os mamutes), como espiritualmente (memeticamente), um processo que demora, dezenas, centenas, milhares de anos.

Significa isto que no actual contexto de mudança —politico-militar, económico-financeiro e sócio-cultural— deverão sobreviver os grupos humanos que rapidamente se adaptarem à mudança em curso, não os actualmente mais fortes, menos ainda os que se recusam a reconhecer a existência da mudança e, reaccionariamente, se esforçam, desesperadamente, por regressar ao passado.

 

Mudam-se os tempos, mudam-se as vontades, 
Muda-se o ser, muda-se a confiança: 
Todo o mundo é composto de mudança, 
Tomando sempre novas qualidades. 

Continuamente vemos novidades, 
Diferentes em tudo da esperança: 
Do mal ficam as mágoas na lembrança, 
E do bem (se algum houve) as saudades. 

O tempo cobre o chão de verde manto, 
Que já coberto foi de neve fria, 
E em mim converte em choro o doce canto. 

E afora este mudar-se cada dia, 
Outra mudança faz de mor espanto, 
Que não se muda já como soía. 

Luís Vaz de Camões, in “Sonetos”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FIM

 

O rei vai nu

ou Da descredibilização da narrativa

19.07.23 | Duarte Pacheco Pereira

O rei vai nu.jpg

 

Uma coisa é a realidade, outra coisa é a narrativa.

A narrativa é a forma como transmitimos aos outros a nossa percepção da realidade.

Logo a narrativa não coincide completamente com a realidade, ou porque não percebemos completamente a realidade, ou porque nos interessa transmitir aos outros uma percepção da realidade que com ela não coincide completamente.

Se a narrativa se afastar demasiado da realidade mais cedo ou mais tarde todos se aperceberão da discrepância, o que descredibilizará a narrativa e quem a veicula.

———————

Quem és tu? perguntei
Ao ver tamanha beleza
E o espelho em que me mirei
Mostrou-me a realeza

Sim, eu sou rei de tudo
vaidoso quero permanecer
De opulento quase expludo
e todos tem de me obedecer

Eu sou o rei que brilha
Encanta, fascina e deslumbra
Sou a oitava maravilha
formosura que assombra

Mas pobre de mim, que desgraça
que irónica adversidade
Não haver trapinho que jus faça
A tão ofuscante personalidade

Tu aí, súbdito leal
vais procurar com critério
pois quero para o desfile real
O melhor tecido do império

Sim meu rei adorado
Viajarei de lés a lés
Para trazer um brocado
que jogue o mundo a teus pés

E lá foi o real mensageiro
De povoado em povoado
À procura de mágico tecido
Por ninguém antes usado

Quando tudo parecia perdido
após muito reino palmilhado
Eis que alguém teria ouvido
Falar do tecido desejado

Mesmo, mesmo ali ao lado
À distância de apenas um passo
Estava um velho encapuzado
que dizia a compasso

Sei fazer um tecido vistoso
De cores nunca antes vistas
Um entrelaçado curioso
de padrões vanguardistas

Mas é tecido especial
Não é para todas as mentes
Pois só o podem ver
aqueles que são inteligentes

E assim foi apresentado
O espertalhão ao rei vaidoso
Para tecer o muito aguardado
Tecido maravilhoso

Trabalhou por um dia
dois, três e uma semana
Mais tempo que o que previa
Sua majestade ufana

Eis que o orgulhoso regente
cansado de tanto esperar
manda o seu mais inteligente
Ver o que se estava a passar

Ao chegar à sala do tear
do velho encapuzado
ao inteligente falta-lhe o ar
e fica petrificado

Os olhos esgazeados
Percorrem o vazio
ao invés do tecido esperado
Não se vê nem um fio

E o velho a sorrir
Aponta para o tear
Diz: Foi difícil de cerzir
Mas está como era de esperar

O inteligente esboça
um gesto de compreensão
pois não quer ser motivo de troça
Pela sua falta de visão

Com corte nunca antes visto
É bonito, arrojado e moderno
Vai servir como previsto
Ao nosso suserano

E assim foi espantado
O inteligente ministro
Dar notícias ao potentado
do que afinal não tinha visto

O rei entusiasmou-se
E informou decidir
que daria o que fosse
Bastaria o velho pedir

E assim fez o velho
Pediu o seu peso em ouro
E o real pingarelho
Deu-lhe parte do tesouro

Chegou o dia esperado
a hora do desfile real
O rei todo pelado
Numa imagem surreal

Que linda é essa vestimenta
Diz o real conselheiro
E que bem que assenta
No vosso real traseiro

E o rei embevecido
de pirilau a pender
Abalou sem nada vestido
Sem se aperceber

Estupefação geral
Silêncio na parada
Sua alteza real
Trazias as joias penduradas

O rei avançou decidido
Por entre a multidão
Até que se ouve um alarido
Uma grande comoção

Um petiz atrevido
Apontando para o real tutu
Grita bem divertido
OLHEM O REI VAI NÚ !

———————

 

Imagem e poema roubados a nunomaf

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FIM

 

The Collapse of the West, Spring/Summer 2023

Hans Vogel • The Uns Review • July 2, 2023 • 2,300 Words • Has Comments

10.07.23 | Duarte Pacheco Pereira

shutterstock_1890564304-1200 × 800

The original and readers’ comments here.
The article can be read in several languages because the original has an automatic translation device.
O artigo pode ser lido em vários idiomas porque o original possui um dispositivo de tradução automática.


No longer is it a matter of speculation whether or not the “West” is in free fall. It clearly is, and it is clearly intentional. The Great Covid Show, brought to you by the usual suspects, seems to have created the right conditions for the “Great Reset.” There were some hiccups, because an operation so vast and all-encompassing as the Great Covid Show was beyond the technical and intellectual capabilities of the US neocons and their foreign cronies, including the WEF, the WHO and the EU.

The Russian Special Military Operation in the Ukraine has complicated matters. Like in a game of chess, Russia is forcing the US and its vassals to make moves they had not planned or had counted on making only later in the game. Such moves are definitely not to their advantage. That is why governments are making such drastic decisions in so many different fields, and all at the same time.

They had planned to drastically reorganize agriculture, following the example set by the Bolsheviks after 1929, when they started to evict and exterminate the kulaks. Instead of collectivization, the latter-day Bolsheviks want giant corporations to dominate agriculture. But the essence of these schemes is the same: the small and intermediate farmers need to be dislodged either voluntarily or by brute force. Seemingly somewhat earlier than what the original script called for, the Dutch government has started a war on farmers, which like in the former USSR, may result in widespread food scarcity, if not famine.

In the same hardheaded fashion, with an obedient Germany leading the pack, US client states in Europe, are currently committing economic suicide by cutting off their industry from reliable sources of affordable energy, forcing both producers and the public to rely on wind and solar energy. All of this is being done in the name of the so-called Green Agenda, so as to reduce carbon and nitrogen emissions. At the same time, the believers in anthropogenic climate change are promoting environmental destruction on a truly gigantic scale wherever lithium and other minerals needed for the manufacture of electric batteries are found. Like every plank in the platform of the Great Reset mafia, the official climate change narrative is held together by the most flagrant contradictions.

The most glaring contradictions occur in the day-to-day functioning of governments, especially in the EU. Like the government of the Netherlands, most of these routinely take decisions that are in clear or implicit violation of the constitution and other legislation.

In spite of the countless contradictions in terms of politics itself, official political discourse and the intrinsic contradictions underlying most political decisions, it is a miracle the US Empire still manages to stay alive. Perhaps that also explains why AI is currently being rolled out: in the hopes that it will help maintain US power. However, it must be doubted whether AI will prove to be able to function in an environment where legal, linguistic and lexicographic confusion and contradiction have become the norm.

With politicians and state and corporate media in the “West” dutifully referring to “our democracy,” “Western values” (supposedly defending human rights), “transparency” and “the rule of law,” while actually doing and advocating everything that is diametrically opposed, it would seem that sooner or later AI must break down. After all AI, like the electronic system that it is, functions on the premise that “0” is “0” and that “1” is “1”. When “0” can also mean “1” and “1” is sometimes “0”, collapse is inevitable. How is it going to tell when “democracy” means “rule by popular majority vote” or its opposite, rule by a corrupt clique of criminals, as is the case in modern “democracies?” Moreover, given the fanatical determination with which reliable sources of energy everywhere in the “West” are being abandoned, precisely now that everything that sustains life depends on electronics, the entire system increasingly resembles a house built on quicksand.

Wherever one looks in Europe, collapse is just around the corner. Today, driving on Germany’s once famous Autobahns is sort of an ordeal. Once upon a time, one could enjoy the view of splendid and sometimes spectacular landscapes while driving relaxedly on the smooth surface of impeccably maintained superhighways. With a total length of more than 13,000 kilometers, Germany has the fourth network in the world, only preceded by Spain, the US and China. There are 50 million cars in Germany, but the network is also intensively used by foreign truck drivers delivering and picking up merchandise and in summer and winter by millions of foreigners on their way to holiday destinations. The Autobahn network is used very intensively, but maintenance has long been neglected and as a result, extensive stretches of highway need to be narrowed in order to enable road and bridge repairs. This causes long and time-consuming traffic jams all over the country from early morning to late at night. Add to that the fact that many drivers hail from non-Western lands, where the proverbial German discipline and respect for rules and regulations are not taught from an early age, and it is clear that driving on the Autobahn consumes inordinate amounts of time and energy. As a matter of fact, the German highway system seems very near the breaking point.

Upon drawing this conclusion it occurred to me that the German federal highways are a symbol for what is happening all over Europe: the very pillars that sustain state and society are breaking down. Of course, for those with eyes to see, the collapse has already set some time ago, perhaps two decades, if not earlier. Just like those three WTC towers that collapsed on 9/11, the collapse begins hesitantly and then accelerates. Like in the case of the WTC towers, the widespread destruction that takes place in the “West” today is planned. However, in a number of fields the collapse had already begun long before in the form of corruption. With corrupt people moving from one field of endeavor to another, corruption spreads even faster and eventually becomes systemic.

For instance, academic corruption may lead to plagiarism and the manipulation of research data. Mrs. Ursula von der Leyen, MD, the unelected president of the EuSSR, has never been able to shake off the odor of academic fraud (committed when writing her dissertation) that surrounds her. It came as no surprise to learn that she has been making secret deals with the Pfizer company for the supply of untested vaccines and to force these on an unsuspecting public during the Great Covid Show. Once corrupt, always corrupt, as one might say.

While fraud increasingly destroys the value of academic research, academic education itself is also under attack. The Dutch education minister intends to reduce the credit requirements for freshmen by half. This means that more students will be allowed to stay on to become sophomores, with the predictable final result that university degrees will devaluate even further.

Corruption in the field of medicine has become apparent during the Great Covid Show, to the point where today no physician can be trusted. To put it simply, family doctors and specialists alike are essentially drug pushers in the service of Big Pharma. There are still some honest and decent doctors out there, but these are hard to find.

Like academic research, education, politics and medicine, the judicial system is riddled with corruption and in free fall. Just take the recent case against Professor Sucharit Bhakdi, who was accused of being an antisemite, on the basis of the flimsiest evidence imaginable. Although this eloquent and influential critic of the covid policies decreed by the German government was acquitted, the public prosecutor nonetheless has decided to appeal and to press ahead trying to put Doctor Bhakdi behind bars at any cost. For a public prosecutor to proceed in such a manner, in complete denial of the fact there is no evidence that supports the case, is more than a travesty of justice: it s turning justice into a silly joke. It is indeed concerning that no one raises an eyebrow, which is a telling illustration on how far the judicial system in Germany (and for that matter in the rest of Europe) has been corrupted.

Yet in the eyes of the state, to express doubts or concern about such matters is a sin. Just recently, the Dutch state spy service AIVD has issued a report stating that about 100,000 Dutch citizens distrust the state and the government, which allegedly makes them “conspiracy theorists.” Increasingly and almost openly, it is being suggested that such people need to be subjected to psychiatric treatment. Any sane person would not trust the government more than the government trusts him, and no doubt many people are faithful to that principle, but apparently the government of the Netherlands which is, of course, a “democratic” country, begs to differ.

There are more than enough reasons for distrusting the government, not only of the Netherlands, but of all EU nations. The German government, dominated by the Greens, has become the belligerent, self-destructive lapdog of the US, set on chasing out industry and humiliating, impoverishing and decimating native Germans. The Italian government, headed by Giorgia Meloni, elected because of her solemn promises to halt the illegal immigration of grossly unqualified, uneducated and hostile black Africans and Muslims, now actively encourages such people to come to Italy. French president Macron, who looks and acts like a homosexual adolescent who married his mother, has consistently been carrying out policies to destroy the French middle class. The Dutch government has presided over the impoverishment of the middle class, to the point where today, 400,000 schoolchildren are living beneath the poverty level, and whose parents are unable to pay for breakfast and new clothes.

The German government is seriously considering to outlaw the conservative AfD party. This comes as no surprise in a country that has a venerable tradition of forbidding parties deemed unwelcome in its democratic system. For many years, the Communist Party was outlawed in West-Germany. In the Netherlands, the conservative party FvD is expecting a decision to be outlawed in the near future. This is all in line with the Ukraine, defending “Western values” against the evil Russians: Zelensky has simply outlawed eleven parties. Long live Democracy!

Not surprisingly, among the population quite a bit of anger has been building up for some time, with the anger in creasing each and every time governments issue a new decree further limiting freedoms or increasing prices.

Since France has always been a nation where the middle class is strong and the working class militant, and where people are ready to take to the streets to voice their indignation and anger, it is hardly surprising that during the past years it has seen mass demonstrations by the Yellow Vest movement and people protesting against drastic pension cuts. Having seen how those peaceful demonstrations were brutally and ruthlessly repressed by the police and assorted goon squads, now the North Africans and black Africans from the banlieues, the suburbs have taken a different approach. Since at least some 15% of Metropolitan France’s 65 million inhabitants are North African (Moroccan, Algerian, Tunisian) or black, and most of these live in the big cities: Paris, Lyon, Marseille, Lille, Toulouse, Bordeaux, now that they are coming on stage, things look quite serious.

The wave of urban warfare in France means that the collapse has now entered a new phase, that of organized and coordinated anti-state violence with racial undertones.

North African Muslims and African blacks are seen participating in what looks like a civil war against state, cultural and commercial targets and against white Frenchmen. Therefore, the current eruption of violence not only has the makings of a civil war, but rather of a race war.

Whatever triggered the current wave of violence, it should also be seen as a logical consequence of decades of French policies decreed at the behest of the unelected EU Commission.

What has been happening in France could easily take place in other EU nations tomorrow, for the simple reason that conditions in many places are similar to those in France. Many EU member states, notably Germany, Sweden, the Netherlands, Belgium also have Muslim minorities of 10 to 15%. Like many working-class neighborhoods and suburbs in France, parts of the Swedish cities of Stockholm, Göteborg, Malmö have long been inaccessible for the police. The same goes for a number of cities in Germany, including Berlin and the Ruhr area. Even under the very noses of the commissars of the Fourth Reich in Brussels, entire neighborhoods of that city are no-go areas.

It has been suggested that the events in France are part of the “Great Reset” propagated by the WEF.

Actually, that “Great Reset” is a just another term for a lot of destruction, disease, death, war, misery and fear. It would seem the Four Riders of the Apocalypse have sent their vanguard to prepare the terrain and they will show up soon. In this respect, it is to be noted that the slogan “build back better,” so prominent and so ubiquitous just a few years ago, has completely vanished from state propaganda everywhere.

In order to “build back better,” everything needs to be broken down first. Evidently that is not what the rulers of all those “democratic” states in the “West” have been telling their “voters.”

But not to worry, the “West” is composed of “value-based” societies under “the rule of law,” were “equity” and “diversity” and “human rights” are being upheld, where “carbon and nitrogen emissions” are being limited, and where “fake news” and “disinformation” are banned.

 

Creative-Destruction-chain-stores-1190 × 700

To Beat Retail Monopolies, We Need to Shed Our Consumer Identity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

END

 

 

On the Jewish Question

The Jews desired civic and political emancipation or desired the political power?

03.07.23 | De Situ Orbis

Zur Judenfrage von Karl Marx

Anfang von „Zur Judenfrage“ in den Deutsch-französischen Jahrbüchern 1844, Seite 182


The German Jews desire emancipation. What kind of emancipation do they desire? Civic, political emancipation.

Bruno Bauer replies to them: No one in Germany is politically emancipated. We ourselves are not free. How are we to free you? You Jews are egoists if you demand a special emancipation for yourselves as Jews. As Germans, you ought to work for the political emancipation of Germany, and as human beings, for the emancipation of mankind, and you should feel the particular kind of your oppression and your shame not as an exception to the rule, but on the contrary as a confirmation of the rule.

Or do the Jews demand the same status as Christian subjects of the state? In that case, they recognize that the Christian state is justified and they recognize, too, the regime of general oppression. Why should they disapprove of their special yoke if they approve of the general yoke? Why should the German be interested in the liberation of the Jew, if the Jew is not interested in the liberation of the German?

The Christian state knows only privileges. In this state, the Jew has the privilege of being a Jew. As a Jew, he has rights which the Christians do not have. Why should he want rights which he does not have, but which the Christians enjoy?

In wanting to be emancipated from the Christian state, the Jew is demanding that the Christian state should give up its religious prejudice. Does he, the Jew, give up his religious prejudice? Has he, then, the right to demand that someone else should renounce his religion?

By its very nature, the Christian state is incapable of emancipating the Jew; but, adds Bauer, by his very nature the Jew cannot be emancipated. So long as the state is Christian and the Jew is Jewish, the one is as incapable of granting emancipation as the other is of receiving it.

The Christian state can behave towards the Jew only in the way characteristic of the Christian state – that is, by granting privileges, by permitting the separation of the Jew from the other subjects, but making him feel the pressure of all the other separate spheres of society, and feel it all the more intensely because he is in religious opposition to the dominant religion. But the Jew, too, can behave towards the state only in a Jewish way – that is, by treating it as something alien to him, by counterposing his imaginary nationality to the real nationality, by counterposing his illusory law to the real law, by deeming himself justified in separating himself from mankind, by abstaining on principle from taking part in the historical movement, by putting his trust in a future which has nothing in common with the future of mankind in general, and by seeing himself as a member of the Jewish people, and the Jewish people as the chosen people.

On what grounds, then, do you Jews want emancipation? On account of your religion? It is the mortal enemy of the state religion. As citizens? In Germany, there are no citizens. As human beings? But you are no more human beings than those to whom you appeal.

Bauer has posed the question of Jewish emancipation in a new form, after giving a critical analysis of the previous formulations and solutions of the question. What, he asks, is the nature of the Jew who is to be emancipated and of the Christian state that is to emancipate him? He replies by a critique of the Jewish religion, he analyzes the religious opposition between Judaism and Christianity, he elucidates the essence of the Christian state – and he does all this audaciously, trenchantly, wittily, and with profundity, in a style of writing that is as precise as it is pithy and vigorous.

How, then, does Bauer solve the Jewish question? What is the result? The formulation of a question is its solution. The critique of the Jewish question is the answer to the Jewish question. The summary, therefore, is as follows:

We must emancipate ourselves before we can emancipate others.

The most rigid form of the opposition between the Jew and the Christian is the religious  opposition. How is an opposition resolved? By making it impossible. How is religious opposition made impossible? By abolishing religion. As soon as Jew and Christian recognize that their respective religions are no more than different stages in the development of the human mind, different snake skins cast off by history, and that man is the snake who sloughed them, the relation of Jew and Christian is no longer religious but is only a critical, scientific, and human relation. Science, then, constitutes their unity. But, contradictions in science are resolved by science itself.

— Karl Marx. On The Jewish Question. Written on Autumn 1843. First Published on February, 1844.

 

 

It’s Time to Drop the Jew Taboo


It’s making serious discussion of Russian geopolitics and history next to impossible.

Charles BausmanRussia Insider | January 15, 2018 | 6030 words

This post first appeared on Russia Insider


(The paintings used as illustrations in this article are taken from the website of Ilya Glazunov and can be seen full-size in HD here and here. Russia Insider published a long profile of him and his work in 2016. Much of his work, both paintings and books, dealt extensively with the Jewish role in Russian history.)


This article is now available in French, Spanish, Polish, and Russian, all of them translated by volunteers. German anyone?

 
 

 

1. Introduction

Most people know about, but few are willing to condemn, the strict taboo in the media, of criticizing Jews as a group, using that term. One cannot even criticize a small subsection of Jews, a miniscule percentage of the Jewish population, even when they richly deserve it.

Obviously, this is a ridiculous way to run a publication whose object is to get to the truth, so I am writing this to explain why, from now on, the pages of Russia Insider will be open to articles which fairly and honestly address the influence of Jewish elites, including pointing out when it is malevolent, which it often is, and try to understand it and explain it, with malice towards none.

I have become convinced that unless we break this taboo, nothing will improve in the human catastrophe unfolding in geopolitics. Millions have died over the past 30 years, and if we want it to stop that trend and avoid a cataclysm which seems to be approaching inexorably, we have to have the freedom to criticize those responsible. It is very clear to me, as it is to many others, that much of the guilt for this comes from Jewish pressure groups, particularly in the media.

 

 TO READ THIS ARTICLE CLICK HERE 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

END